Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Window Display


This is the window display of the wholesale china store right next to my work office on 26th St. and 5th Ave. I wasn't allowed to take photographs inside, but the beauty on the outside is reflective of the beauty on the inside: intricate, colorful, and delicate patterns on porcelain white dishes. I love the fashion and artwork of late 18th-century France, and this always brings me back to daydreams of Versailles.

*As I write this in the coffee shop, a classical song from the Marie Antoinette soundtrack has just begun playing in the background. What perfect timing.

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Apple and the Abuse of Labor Standards in China

Apple, one of the most successful technological companies in history, is under a lot of fire after an explosive new report was published by the New York Times detailing the company's disregard for safety standards among its suppliers in China.

The article, "Apple Accused of Ignoring Labor Abuses that Can Kill," details a long list of problems and labor violations at plants in China where iPads, iPhones, and other Apple products are manufactured. It also accuses Apple of largely ignoring these problems, while claiming their plants are highly regulated and held to strict ethical standards.

The report is highly extensive, with interviews and reports showing employees working 60+ hours a week, or more than 12 hours a day, six days a week in some cases. Employees often live in small, cramped dorm spaces and work with dangerous chemicals in rooms with little ventilation, the article also says.

The explanation for these violations is one we've heard a million times before: consumers want products fast and they want them cheap. In order to keep up with demand, both from consumers and from the Apple company, manufacturing factories cut corners to improve output. And Apple doesn't really demand a change.

"Apple says that when an audit reveals a violation, the company requires suppliers to address the problem within 90 days and make changes to prevent a recurrence. 'If a supplier is unwilling to change, we terminate our relationship,' the company says on its website.

"The seriousness of that threat, however, is unclear. Apple has found violations in hundreds of audits, but fewer than 15 suppliers have been terminated for transgressions since 2007, according to former Apple executives."

Big surprise. Apple's PR wheel is always running on high gear to give buyers a sense of well-being about their Chinese-made gadgets, but the truth isn't so rosy. It never is, as we've found time and time again through investigations into similar companies.

Twitter was very busy on Thursday when this article was first published, with lots of people commenting in horror on the report's assertions. Apple also expressed outrage, saying that it cares deeply about its workers and will continue investigating violations at its plants. Talk is still going on today about possible PR repercussions of the report, and there have been numerous follow-up articles on the backlash.

While Apple shares a lot of responsibility for properly monitoring its factories, its use of cheap labor and back-breaking work conditions is not entirely their fault. They may claim to do their best at overseeing the manufacturering process, and such egregious violations of fair labor standards may show that they are failing, but the truth is this: consumer demand fueling the production rate of new Apple products is unrealistic. No one can expect millions of new and improved iPhones and iPads every year to hit the market without manufacturers and plant workers bearing an unhealthy workload. It's not feasible and everyone knows it, yet we continue to act surprised and outraged when faced with reports of that reality.

Unfortunately a very pervasent cultural mentality has taken hold in our culture over the past century: a mentality that the customer is always right, and that the customer gets whatever they want, at whatever the cost.

It's a mentality I learned well while working for a department store for three years in high school, and that I reflected on often while living in France, a country where such thinking is not so prevalent. As Apple and other companies have continually bought in to that psychology, they have constantly competed to feed the consumer's demand for, as I said earlier, cheaper and faster products than ever.

No one dares to stand up and say "No, you don't get everything you want. Cheaper and faster products come at an inhuman cost, and we're not willing to pay that. Get over it." Instead they just give in, for the profit, and then everyone follows suit in order to remain competitive. Once you've given in a million times over, it's pretty hard to reverse course.

Consumers deserve blame for not caring about where or how their cheap products are made. But companies are also to blame for catering to that demand, even when doing so requires the services of $1-a-day, 12+ hours a day, sometimes child workers. I do hope this controversy continues, and I hope all the horrified readers realize they can't have it both ways.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Back to the Futurama



Apparently this story is two years old, but I just saw it on the news rounds today. This art piece is called Back to the Futurama by New York artist Jeremy Dean. Dean bought a Hummer H2, cut it in half, modified it and got two horses (named Duke and Diesel) to pull it as a stagecoach around Central Park in March 2010.

The name Back to the Futurama is derived from two different things: First, a General Motors-sponsored exhibition in 1939 at the New York World's Fair, "Futurama," and Second, the 1980s film Back to the Future. Also known as the "CEO Stagecoach," Dean called the artwork part protest and part sculpture. The most environmentally efficient Hummer created, it has silver chrome, working LED lights, and an audio and video system.

Back to the Futurama seeks to represent, among other things, the failure of America's consumer culture. According to Dean, it also "focuses on the rise and fall of the automobile industry as a symbol of the vulnerability of American capitalism." The work sparked both controversy and intense conversation when it displayed at New York's Armory Week in 2010, and I believe it has been on exhibit in various other locations since then.

Unfortunately I cannot find a current location for the piece, so it looks like I may have missed it. I'll keep my eyes peeled though, because Back to the Futurama looks like it would be an amazing thing to see.

My Blogging Break

So as you've noticed, I've taken a little break from blogging in the past month or so. There have been a lot of big changes though and I'm still fully settling into it all, so that's my excuse.

I've started a full-time job, moved into a new apartment (that needs lots of furnishings and some repairs), and started trying to be more social. I still have a huge list of things I need to get done, but I'm going to try making this blog a bigger priority again.

Unfortunately my apartment doesn't have Wi-Fi, another "furnishing" I need to worry about. Luckily I have a Starbucks just across the street-and the employees there are already starting to recognize me. Let the blogging recommence!